Friday, March 27, 2009

Barbies among Sisters, Kens among Brothers


Remember the Barbie and Ken doll craze of our childhood? My sister had a Barbie doll, Ken doll, Barbie and Ken's friends dolls, and whatever other dolls there were. I'm pretty sure she even had a Barbie Car for them to ride in. The thing I remember most about the Barbie doll craze is how perfect their physical forms were, remember that? Barbie had the supposed perfect form, blonde hair, bright white smile, and her hubby [or live-in partner, ;), whatever he was], Ken, had the slender, fit physique, 'perfect' skin tone and all. I'm not sure what the Barbie creators based their design on, but I know this much, it wasn't based on the average American Joe. Well, the average American, non-Californian Joe. :) Why did they create them so "perfectly" formed?

Well, it only makes sense, really. Our society responded so well to the Barbie craze because there is such a craving for "looking the best, being the best." We saw then and we see today the constant push to have the perfect "bod," the best hair, the whitest teeth, the smoothest skin, etc. (Okay, part of me has to admit that some of the fitness craze is not all bad, after all, we are the fattest, laziest country in the world, it seems) The problem, though, is that we are so focused on what our outside looks like, that the inside gets little or no attention. Thus, the result is a bunch of Kens and Barbies running around, that is, 'pretty' on the outside, empty like a plastic bottle on the inside.

As the church has moved forward into the technologically advanced, progressively contemporary culture, a problem has come up. (Truly, I'm kind of barking at the choir on this, because we've all heard and talked about what I'm talking about in this post) and this is it: We have many Barbies among Sisters, and Kens among Brothers. That is, mixed in the fellowship of Christ, the church, there are fervent, faithful followers of Christ (AKA believers) and empty, worldly focused ragamuffins, (AKA Barbies and Kens). . . and I'm not yakking' at the Barbies and Kens, wishing they would vacate from the premises of our churches. Quite the opposite in fact, they truly need Jesus "more," if you will, than already existing believers. I am, though, yakking at the leadership of Christ's church simply because of their lack of true teaching, edification, and biblical responsibility as leaders.

Matt Chandler, lead pastor of The Village Church, made a great point in a recent sermon. He basically said that if you go to a church and everybody looks perfect, and everybody holds hands, and nobody seems to have any problems, and they hug each other and serve each other perfectly, that you should LEAVE QUICKLY!!. His point in a nutshell is that there is no perfect place, because mankind is wholly broken. Sure, some believers are hopefully more mature, more encouraging, more exemplary, more exciting, and more faithful than others, but they are called leaders (at least ideally). So if everyone acts (key word, 'acts') perfect, than there is a much bigger problem in that community than what appears on the surface.

Bottom line: I worry that the church today, or at least in many expressions of it, is messily struggling with trying to look real pretty on the outside, but looking awfully ugly on the inside. It seems as though people want to look like Barbie, or look like Ken, all while not caring about the empty plastic this kind of lifestyle exhibits. The goal is to look like Christ, not like Barbie, right? So why, then, do we look like Barbie and like Ken, in many respects?

. . . my computer is about to die, so I will pause for now, but more is to come later. In the mean time, fill me in on where I'm wrong, and maybe where I'm right, but didn't flesh it out enough . . .

Thursday, March 05, 2009

I Have a Serious Problem With This:

Over at Ed Stetzer's blog, there is some interesting conversation taking place regarding an influential pastor from one of the mega-churches in America. Stetzer interviews Andy Stanley, pastor of North Point Community Church in Atlanta, Ga. Here's one thing that was asked and the answer follows:

"Question: What do you think about preaching verse-by-verse messages through books of the Bible?

Andy: Guys that preach verse-by-verse through books of the Bible-- that is just cheating. It's cheating because that would be easy, first of all. That isn't how you grow people. No one in the Scripture modeled that. There's not one example of that.

All Scripture is equally inspired, but not all Scripture is equally applicable or relevant to every stage of life. My challenge is to read culture and to read an audience and ask: What is the felt need? Or perhaps what is more important, what is an unfelt need they need to feel that I can address? Because if they don't feel it, then they won't address it.

So how can I make them feel an unfelt need and then make them feel like they need to do something about it? But when you do that, people are like, "Man, that is amazing. You're brilliant." No, all you have done is unearthed a need and you talked about it. "I have never heard anyone talk about that before." Probably, no one has ever made you feel that before. So they talked about it, but it didn't register because they didn't make you feel like you needed to hear about it to start with."

Frankly, I'm a little shocked. I have heard Stanley several times in person, in Atlanta, at Northpoint. I was always impressed, challenged, and thought he was on the right page. Sure, I wouldn't do things quite like he does them, but I didn't think he was saying/doing anything that was cause for question. Maybe I was a little "wet behind the ears" then . . . I don't know.

I marked out the specific places in which I am most concerned with Stanley's words.

Monday, March 02, 2009

Obama Nation

With the news of yet another horrible selection of Obama's power party, I'm beginning to wonder if we* picked the right guy . . . Oh wait a minute, that's right, I never thought he was a good choice, yeah yeah that's it . . .

taxes, taxes, taxes . . . can't pay your taxes, can't lead our country . . .

Oh God in heaven, when will this foolish nation realize her mistakes?!?!?!

* 'we,' of course, here is used very, extremely, wildly, openly loose.